There's nothing more pathetic than your false bravado. And nothing more at variance with your history. During the last 1000 years, you have been cannon fodder for Turkish military might and a poor cousin to sophisticated Persian bureaucracy. All these years, you lacked both the stomach for an open combat and the strategic generalship to do so. What you could not achieve materially or militarily, you left your bard to dream of. True to your character, you have, off late, been most virulent as a sly assassin, an unruly mob against a numerically inferior opponent or as a nameless and faceless 'internet hindu'. Oh, did you know that the 'Hindu' is a term coined by the Arabs?
So much for the 'Shaurya Diwas' that you celebrated on Dec 6th - a day that should rank together with the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas and the Twin Towers as one of the most barbaric acts in recent history. The above paragraph is for you to go get a reality check.
If you believe that Islam was spread just by the sword, you are mistaken. If you believe that the Turk and Hindu were always confrontational, you are mistaken. If you turn your eyes away from the richness of the Indo-Islamic heritage and the 'Hindu' element in it, you are mistaken. But, most of all, if you try to avenge history by reducing yourself to medieval standards of barbarity, you are not what the country deserves. And, that is not what a 'Hindu Renaissance' should consist of.
Swami Vivekanda, whom you routinely appropriate to justify 'Hindu re-awakening', was essentially a philosopher and would have nothing to do with riff-raff like you. Swamiji would often say -
"Jeebe prem kore jei jon...
Shei jon shebiche ishwar.."
This would translate into - "Love your fellow beings to really love God.."
Unfortunately, you need to do a lot to truly appreciate this.
